• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Banking

COVID and European banks

Posted by e-axes on June 9, 2020

Read Next →

Banking

The Unfinished Reform of Global Payments

Banking

How Financial Rules Shape Innovation

Banking

Zombie Firms, Credit Markets, and Financial Intermediation

The impact of COVID on European banks

In this post, Constantin Gurdgiev cites a recent McKinsey study which forecasts that a muted recovery in Europe would lead to a 40% drop in European banks’ revenue as well as a drop of 11% in ROE by 2021. In addition, the pandemic has accelerated structural trends such as high digital engagement levels and a significant decrease in the use of cash for which many European banks are not prepared for. Against this background, it is banks operating in the 2008-2014 crises-hit economies, such as Ireland, Italy, Spain and Portugal, that might be the most vulnerable.


COVID19 and European Banking
By: Constantin Gurdgiev – Trinity College Dublin

The risk of defaults

The non-repayment of one in five loans would be enough to exhaust the current level of capital. The resolution mechanism would then have to be mobilised, which is unlikely to be sufficient in a context where, according to the European Systemic Risk Board, the risk of simultaneous defaults is increasing sharply. It would then be possible to mobilise the European Stability mechanism. Should this instrument prove insufficient, the risk of the re-emergence of a sovereign debt crisis would increase.


European Banks and the Covid-19 Crash Test
Authors: Jézabel Couppey-Soubeyran, Erica Perego, Fabien Tripier
From: CEPII

Do provisioning rules make things worse?

The rules that dictate the way banks provision for loan losses are crucial because they directly affect the ability of banks to continue lending to the real economy.

  • Before the financial crisis these rules relied on the concept of “incurred loss” and were blamed for excessively delaying the recognition by lenders of credit losses;
  • As a result, after the financial crisis, new accounting standards were established which rely on the concept of “expected credit loss” i.e. financial institutions are required to provision for expected future credit losses using all information available.

Since the outbreak of the COVID crisis, bankers have feared that the application of the new expected loss models may lead to a sudden significant increase in credit loss provisions, which would result in an erosion of banks’ capital. But these concerns, argues Lucas Mahieux, are only valid if prudential regulators set banks’ capital requirements independently of the accounting standards used to provision for loan losses. This is not the case neither in the US nor in Europe where policymakers have acknowledged the connection between accounting rules and capital requirements: as a result, although European banks must provision for “expected credit losses”,  they are also likely to face looser capital requirements in the next few years.
Bank loss provisioning rules: a convenient scapegoat in the Covid-19 crisis?
By: Lucas Mahieux – Tilburg University

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Banking

The Unfinished Reform of Global Payments

Banking

How Financial Rules Shape Innovation

Banking

Zombie Firms, Credit Markets, and Financial Intermediation

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • From Information to Liquidity: How Stablecoins Reshape Bank Intermediation
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Fertility Falls Everywhere But Will Growth Suffer?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT