Are green innovators motivated by prosocial attitudes?
This is the question that Guzman et al. explore in their paper. They carry out an interesting field experiment using MIT Solve, a premier competition focused on solving the world’s problems. More specifically, they email over 30,000 grantees of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) award by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to encourage them to learn more and apply to the MIT Solve competition. Using different scientifically valid scenarios from climate science, the emails provide information that randomly vary the time frame of climate change impact (to occur in 2020 vs. 2050) and the estimated number of lives at stake (150,000 vs. 400,000 lives per year).
- Through email clicks, they find that innovators respond more when climate impact is framed as occurring sooner and human loss is greater in scale.
- They use this data to estimate the parameters of an economic model of innovator response to the impact of climate change, where the innovator’s value of acting on climate change depends directly on the elasticity of action to number of lives lost, and a welfare discount rate for the timing of human loss. They estimate a welfare discount rate of 0.76%, and an elasticity to number of lives lost of 0.23, implying a diminishing marginal concern as the human toll of climate change increases.
Environmental Preferences and Technological Choices : Is Market Competition Clean or Dirty?
Authors: Philippe Aghion, Roland Bénabou, Ralf Martin, Alexandra Roulet
From: Collège de France, Princeton University, Imperial College London, INSEAD
Are green innovators motivated by competition?
In this paper Aghion et al. examine how consumers’ environmental concerns and market competition affect firms’ decisions to innovate in “clean” technologies. They develop a simple model of innovation where agents care about both the level and the environmental footprint of their consumption, and analyze how these preferences together with market structure, affect the equilibrium amount of clean R&D, and through it aggregate pollution and welfare.
While the direct, short-run impact of competition on the environment is always negative –lower prices induce more consumption and therefore more pollution– it can also encourage clean innovation as a means of product differentiation. Intuitively, firms will seek to develop greener products when facing more environmentally motivated customers, and the more so, the harder they must compete for them. Due to its offsetting quantity and quality effects, the impact of competition on emissions has a concave profile. As consumer’s environmental preferences and competition are complements, more prosocial consumers make increases in competition less environmentally costly by leading to increase in green R&D. They test their theory using panel data on patents by 8,562 automobile-sector firms in 41 countries, environmental willingness-to-pay, and competition.
[O]ur empirical analysis suggests that the combination of realistic increases in prosocial attitudes and in product market competition can have the same effect on green innovation as a 34% increase in fuel prices worldwide.

How Do (Green) Innovators Respond to Climate Change Scenarios? Evidence from a Field Experiment
Authors: Jorge Guzman, Jean Joohyun Oh, Ananya Sen
From: Columbia University, Carnegie Mellon University