• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

International Economics

US dollar intervention

Posted by e-axes on August 6, 2019

Read Next →

International Economics

Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks

International Economics

China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals

International Economics

Japan’s Yen as Funding Currency: Debt, Risk and Global Spillovers

The long-term harm from a US dollar intervention

According to Cecchetti and Schoenholtz, there are two negative consequences from any action aimed at weakening the dollar:

  • The Federal Reserve would be compelled to sacrifice monetary control: the daily volume in the foreign exchange market exceeds $5 trillion per day, and the dollar is one side of nearly 90 percent of transactions. To have any sustained impact, the volume of intervention would have to be unprecedented in scale and persistent. Should others retaliate, the scale would need to be even bigger. In a world of free cross-border capital flows, a fixed exchange rate and an independent monetary policy aimed at domestic stabilization are incompatible
  • A U.S. shift to an exchange rate target would result in a loss of Federal Reserve independence: since the Secretary of the Treasury is in charge of foreign exchange policy, such shift would compromise the Fed’s mandated objectives of low inflation and low unemployment for the executive branch objective of reducing the value of the currency. If a war between the Treasury and the Fed were to erupt, that would undermine the attractiveness of U.S. assets and the dollar.


Just say no to exchange rate intervention
By: Stephen G. Cecchetti, Kermit L. Schoenholtz – Brandeis University, New York University

Will the economy benefit from a US dollar intervention?

The U.S. dollar appreciated by 25 percent between July of 2011 and July 2019. As a result, firms that do most of their business abroad, or face intense competition from imports, have suffered, raising concerns that a strong dollar could compromise growth by harming manufacturing. But the data doesn’t show any consistent relationship between dollar strength and manufacturing employment. As seen on the graph below, over the period 2001-09, which saw the steepest historical fall in manufacturing employment, the dollar weakened on average.

Should the United States Try to Weaken the Dollar?
By: Michael Klein, Maurice Obstfeld – Tufts University and University of California, Berkeley

Will a weaker dollar help manufacturing employment?

At some point, nationalist/populists need to decide how severely they are willing to distort the economy in their nostalgic quest. They’ve already turned trade policy into a vivid exercise in self harm. The next hot idea is to manage the nation’s currency to boost manufacturing and exports. But modeling in the 2018 study “Assessing the effects of exchange rate depreciation on the US economy” suggests that while depreciation appears expansionary over the short run, those effects fade and turn negative over the medium term “as personal consumption, consumer confidence, stock prices and housing starts tend to fall.”

Another decent jobs report creates a quandary for populists who want to manage the dollar
By: James Pethokoukis – American Enterprise Institute

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

International Economics

Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks

International Economics

China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals

International Economics

Japan’s Yen as Funding Currency: Debt, Risk and Global Spillovers

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Communicating Uncertainty: Fan Charts, Confidence, and Credibility
  • How Firms’ Cost Expectations Shape Prices
  • Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission
  • Measuring Expectations in Real Time: The Value and Limits of Kalshi Markets
  • Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks
  • When Markets Drift from the Real Economy

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT