• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Economic Growth

The state of the global economy

Posted by e-axes on July 7, 2022

Read Next →

Economic Growth

New Research on the Economic Impact of the Middle East War

Economic Growth

Too Many Buildings, Too Few Machines: How the Composition of Credit Shapes Long-Run Growth

Economic Growth

Generative AI’s Role in Preventing US Recession

The additional downside risks to global growth

The June edition of “Global Economic Prospects” published by the World Bank projects global growth to slow sharply from 5.7 percent in 2021 to 2.9 percent this year. The effects of the invasion account for most of the 1.2 percentage point downward revision to this year’s global growth forecast. Growth in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs) is expected to slow from 6.6 percent in 2021 to 3.4 percent in 2022 due to negative spillovers from the war in Ukraine and a deteriorating global environment. Against this background, Justin Damien Guénette argues that there are various overlapping and mutually reinforcing downside risks, including intensifying geopolitical tensions, rising financial instability, and continuing supply strains. These are:

  • Central banks in advanced countries have increased interest rates and are expected to continue to do so as they are fighting inflationary pressures. As a result, EMDE financial conditions have reached their tightest level since the start of the pandemic, pointing towards rising financial stress.
  • Further major disruptions to energy markets centered around Europe, could lead to spikes in the prices of natural gas, oil, and coal,  leading to sharply lower growth in advanced economies and particularly in the euro area.
  • Large-scale COVID-19 resurgences in China which follows such strict lockdown rules, would trigger intermittent lockdowns all the way through 2023, reducing growth in China by 0.5 percentage point in 2022 and a further 0.3 percentage point in 2023.
  • The simultaneous materialization of all three scenarios presented above could reduce global growth to only 2.1 percent in 2022 and 1.5 percent in 2023—0.8 and 1.5 percentage points slower than in the baseline forecast


How sharp will be the global slowdown?
By: Justin Damien Guénette – Brookings

The situation in the U.S. and Europe

In this commentary, Menzie Chinn wonders whether there has ever been a recession in Europe without a recession in the US. He finds that there have been two European recessions not coincident with US recessions: in the early 1990’s in what was to become the Euro area, and another recession in the Euro area in 2011-12.
He concludes by finding that over the period 1995-2019, the correlation of Q/Q growth rates is about 0.28:  a one percentage change in US growth is associated with a 0.54 percentage point change in Euro area growth. It’s therefore possible for Q/Q growth to diverge between the U.S. and Europe.

Recession Talk: US and Euro Area
By: Menzie Chinn – University of Wisconsin

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Economic Growth

New Research on the Economic Impact of the Middle East War

Economic Growth

Too Many Buildings, Too Few Machines: How the Composition of Credit Shapes Long-Run Growth

Economic Growth

Generative AI’s Role in Preventing US Recession

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT