• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Climate

The ECB, market neutrality and, climate change

Posted by e-axes on October 27, 2020

Read Next →

Climate

Is Economic Growth Compatible With Credible Climate Constraints?

Climate

Can Financial Markets and Economic Literacy Reshape the Politics of Climate? Action

Climate

The Cost of Inconsistent and Incredible Climate Policy

How to “green” monetary policy without affecting market neutrality

Dirk Schoenmaker, in this paper, develops a  method to green monetary policy operations by steering or tilting the allocation of assets and collateral towards low carbon companies in a general way. Such an approach will only introduce minimal distortions to ECB’s asset and collateral base.  The table below depicts the changes  Schoenmaker is proposing. He finds that such an approach can reduce carbon emissions in the corporate and bank bond portfolio by 41 percent.


Greening Monetary Policy
Author: Dirk Schoenmaker
From: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University

How to “green” monetary policy while dropping market neutrality all together

In this policy brief, Dafermos and al. propose two strategies that would significantly reduce the climate footprint of the ECB’s corporate QE purchases but would also take the ECB away from its market neutrality principle.

  • With the first strategy, the ECB stops buying bonds issued by fossil fuel companies with relatively high carbon intensity in the sectors of non-renewable utilities and carbon-intensive transportation. In this case the outstanding amount of green bonds in the ECB list will be slightly higher than the existing one, maintaining therefore the ECB’s ability to affect interest rates during the pandemic;
  • With the second strategy, the ECB excludes all bonds issued by carbon-intensive sectors in favor of green bonds but relaxes the investment grade criterion.

The two approaches are depicted in the figure below as “lower carbon list” and “low carbon list.”


Decarbonising is Easy: Beyond Market Neutrality in the ECB’s Corporate QE
Authors: Yannis Dafermos, Daniela Gabor, Maria Nikolaidi, Adam Pawloff and Frank van Lerven
From: New Economics Foundation

How binding is the market neutrality principle anyway?

Deviations from market neutrality start with the fact that central bank interventions are already conceptually at odds with the notion of neutrality. Central banks intervene to change market outcomes. Many interventions may only target a change in the short-term interest rate, while others may seek to shift interest rates along the entire yield curve. Some may aim to address liquidity constraints in specific market segments. Others have the objective of maintaining an exchange rate target. Whatever their goal is, interventions are not neutral. In fact, the point of central bank interventions is, well, to intervene. […] Central bankers now widely acknowledge that climate risks are mispriced in financial markets, a situation that leads to inefficient outcomes in terms of economic prosperity, financial stability, and – crucially – environmental sustainability. If left unaccounted for by central banks, it also increases the risk exposure of their balance sheets.

Central Bank Market Neutrality is a Myth
By: Chiara Colesanti Senni, Pierre Monnin – CEP

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Climate

Is Economic Growth Compatible With Credible Climate Constraints?

Climate

Can Financial Markets and Economic Literacy Reshape the Politics of Climate? Action

Climate

The Cost of Inconsistent and Incredible Climate Policy

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT