Did tariffs improve job opportunities for US workers?
Javorcik et al., in this paper, use data on the near universe of US online job postings from January 2017 to December 2018 to analyze how the 2018 tariff hikes by both the US and its trading partners affected US labor market opportunities. They look at three possible ways he US-China trade war could have affected online job postings in the US during the immediate aftermath of the tariff hikes in 2018: (i) by protecting US industries through tariffs on their output products; (ii) by increasing the cost of imported inputs for US producers due to tariffs ; and (iii) by leading to retaliatory foreign tariffs on US exports. They found:
- Retaliatory export and imported input tariffs had an economically meaningful negative impact on job postings.
- The impact of output tariffs is not statistically significant once imported input tariffs are controlled for.
- During the second half of 2018 and as the tariffs started to build up, the authors estimate that there was a reduction of 175,000 job postings.
- Both higher skilled and lower skilled job postings were affected by the tariffs, but the magnitude and statistical significance of effects is stronger for lower skilled jobs, for both intermediate inputs and retaliatory tariffs.
Did the 2018 Trade War Improve Job Opportunities for US Workers?
Authors: Beata Javorcik, Katherine Stapleton, Benjamin Kett, Layla O’Kane
From: Oxford University, World Bank, IMF, Burning Glass Technologies
Welfare gains from tariffs
This paper by Antràs et al. takes a more granular look at the impact of tariffs on employment and welfare by differentiating between tariffs imposed on inputs and tariffs imposed on final goods. They analyze the market structures under which tariff escalation emerges as a social-welfare maximizing policy. They use a general-equilibrium framework with an upstream and downstream sector which produce differentiated intermediate and final goods, respectively, both under increasing returns to scale. The assumption of increasing returns to scale is important since neoclassical models with constant returns to scale do not predict that lower input tariffs are optimal. The model is one of a small open economy with a home and foreign country and trade in both inputs and final goods. They find:
When both downstream and upstream sectors produce under increasing returns to scale, a unilateral tariff in either sector boosts the size and productivity of that sector, raising welfare. While these forces are reinforced up the chain for final-good tariffs, input tariffs may drive final-good producers to relocate abroad, mitigating their potential productivity benefits. The welfare benefits of final-good tariffs thus tend to be larger, with the optimal degree of tariff escalation increasing in the extent of downstream returns to scale. A quantitative evaluation of the US-China trade war demonstrates that any welfare gains from the increase in US tariffs are overwhelmingly driven by final-good tariffs.

Trade Policy and Global Sourcing: An Efficiency Rationale for Tariff Escalation
Authors: Pol Antràs, Agustín Gutiérrez, Teresa C. Fort, Felix Tintelnot
From: Harvard University, Tuck School at Dartmouth, University of Chicago