• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Inflation

Shortages, Market Power, and Inflation

Posted by e-axes on May 8, 2025

Read Next →

Inflation

The Illusion of Anchored Inflation Expectations

Inflation

When Algorithms Set Prices, Measuring Inflation Gets Harder

Inflation

De-Anchoring Risk: Evidence and Theory

Measuring supply disruptions and their economic impact through news analysis

Dario Caldara, Matteo Iacoviello, and David Yu create a monthly U.S. Shortage Index (1900–present) by analyzing about 25 million articles from six major newspapers. The authors use keyword searches to identify articles mentioning shortages in four categories: industry, labor, food, and energy. To ensure relevance, articles must include both shortage-related and topic-specific terms, as well as economic context words. The approach is validated using topic modeling, manual review, and AI audits, and the index is compared with other supply constraint measures for accuracy. Finally, the index’s economic impact is assessed using predictive regressions and a structural VAR model that relates the index to GDP, inflation, and other macroeconomic variables.

Key findings

  • The Shortage Index spikes during major economic disruptions (World Wars, 1970s oil crises, COVID-19 pandemic), accurately capturing historical episodes of widespread shortages.
  • Shortages are strongly associated with higher future inflation and lower future economic activity. These effects are persistent and robust even after controlling for traditional indicators like commodity prices and wages.
  • The index improves out-of-sample forecasts of inflation, especially during periods of acute supply disruptions (e.g., post-2020 pandemic era).
  • Structural VAR analysis shows that shortage shocks (unexpected disruptions with both supply constraints and frictions to price adjustment) have a distinct impact: they produce less inflation relative to their impact on GDP compared to traditional supply shocks, suggesting that price adjustment constraints (e.g., price controls, hoarding) limit inflation but exacerbate declines in real activity.
  • Historical decomposition reveals that post-pandemic shortages and inflation were primarily driven by supply-side forces (traditional supply shocks, commodity shocks, and shortage-specific shocks), with demand playing a secondary role.
  • The index offers a unique long-term perspective on shortages, outperforming other indicators in both historical coverage and predictive power for inflation and economic activity.


Measuring Shortages Since 1900
Authors: Dario Caldara, Matteo Iacoviello, David Yu
From: Federal Reserve Board, UCLA

When shortages hit, large firms win and prices rise

This paper by Francesco Franzoni, Mariassunta Giannetti, and Roberto Tubaldi investigates how supply chain shortages impact firm performance and industrial structure. The authors explore whether large firms can navigate supply chain disruptions more effectively than smaller competitors and how these dynamics affect market concentration, pricing power, and ultimately inflation. They use firm-level financial data from Worldscope (covering nearly 19,000 firms in 83 countries), supplier-customer relationship data (Factset Revere), shipping records (U.S. Bills of Lading), and industry-level price and supply chain metrics (PMI, Bloomberg) for the period from  2010 to 2021.  Finally, Franzoni et al. identify large “superstar” firms within industries and compare their supply chain outcomes to smaller firms during periods of disruption.

Key findings

  • Differential Exposure to Supply Chain Shortages
    The authors find that large “superstar” firms have more diversified supplier networks and greater bargaining power. Using Bills of Lading data, they show that during supply chain disruptions, superstar firms receive larger deliveries from the same suppliers compared to smaller customers. Specifically, when delivery times lengthen, superstar firms receive more containers, shipments, and higher volumes than their smaller competitors.
  • Firm-Level Competitive Advantages
    When industries experience supply chain shortages, superstar firms gain market share relative to competitors within the same industry. Large firms experience smaller cost increases than other firms (approximately 10% less than average) but  exhibit higher markups, with about 48% of the markup increase attributable to lower costs and 52% to increased pricing power.
  • Industry Structure and Inflation Impacts
    Industries experience increased concentration (HHI) when supply chain shortages occur, especially in already concentrated sectors.  Aggregate sales decrease more in concentrated industries during disruptions, consistent with reduced competition rather than demand shifts. This mechanism explains up to 23% of U.S. inflation during 2021 at the height of supply chain disruptions.

Supply Chain Shortages, Large Firms’ Market Power, and Inflation
Authors: Francesco Franzoni, Mariassunta Giannetti, Roberto Tubaldi
From: U.S.I Lugano, Stockholm School of Economics, Norwegian Business School

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Inflation

The Illusion of Anchored Inflation Expectations

Inflation

When Algorithms Set Prices, Measuring Inflation Gets Harder

Inflation

De-Anchoring Risk: Evidence and Theory

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT