• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Macro

Redistribution and taxes

Posted by e-axes on November 24, 2020

Read Next →

Macro

Measuring Expectations in Real Time: The Value and Limits of Kalshi Markets

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Sovereign debt and redistribution

In this paper Monica Tran-Xuan proposes a theory of external debt sustainability that comes from the motive for redistribution of the government. In particular, having access to external financing allows the government to have more redistribution, measured as the differences in individual utilities, than in financial autarky at the same level of efficiency cost. In the long run, the labor tax needed to redistribute is lower when having access to external borrowing than in financial autarky.
The model can quantitatively account for the recent buildup of external debt in Italy and is consistent with the positive correlation between pre-tax income inequality and external debt across countries and over time.

Redistribution, Sovereign Debt, and Optimal Taxation
Author: Monica Tran-Xuan
From: University at Buffalo

Financial frictions and redistributive capital taxation

In this paper, Boar and Knowles study optimal redistributive capital taxation in a model where taxation affects how efficiently capital is allocated in the economy. They use an overlapping generations model with two types of households: workers and entrepreneurs. New households decide whether to become workers or entrepreneurs while a utilitarian planner sets tax rates to maximize expected utility of new households in the steady state but also taxes capital in order to redistribute from rich entrepreneurs to the poor workers. Entrepreneurs, on the other hand choose how much capital to allocate to a risky technology and how much to allocate to a risk-free technology; are heterogeneous in their productivity levels and lend to one another through financial markets, but these markets are frictional due to an asymmetric information. The effect of the financial friction is that entrepreneurs are limited in their ability to borrow and are unable to fully diversify idiosyncratic risks. Their model indicates:

  • It is optimal to tax capital income at a positive rate, because general equilibrium effects on the distribution of capital across entrepreneurs attenuate the negative effects of these taxes on output;
  • Optimal wealth taxes are close to zero, since such taxes strongly discourage capital accumulation;
  • Optimal tax rates on capital income, wealth and labor income may not be so far from current practice in the United States, where wealth taxes are zero and labor and capital income tax rates are similar.

Entrepreneurship, Agency Frictions and Redistributive Capital Taxation
Authors: Corina Boar, Matthew Knowles
From: New York University, University of Cologne

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Macro

Measuring Expectations in Real Time: The Value and Limits of Kalshi Markets

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Communicating Uncertainty: Fan Charts, Confidence, and Credibility
  • Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission
  • How Firms’ Cost Expectations Shape Prices
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?
  • Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT