• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

U.S.

On the U.S. federal debt

Posted by e-axes on February 14, 2024

Read Next →

U.S.

Why the Fed Sold Euros, Not Dollars: A Portfolio Balance Reading of the 2026 Yen Intervention

U.S.

Is the U.S. already in recession?

U.S.

On US capitalism

The outlook for the U.S. federal debt

The current debt-to-GDP ratio is close to its level at the end of World War II. In addition, the CBO projects a persistent long-run primary deficit and a low rate of GDP growth compared with interest rates, an outlook that points to a steady increase in the debt ratio. In this commentary, Meisenbacher and Wilson argue that the U.S. is facing a daunting challenge: balancing the primary budget, which was a key factor in the decline of the debt-to-GDP ratio after World War II, would likely require major reforms to spending programs or large increases in tax revenue.

Without major reforms to mandatory spending programs such as Social Security and Medicare, or large tax increases, the primary deficit is expected to persist. This leaves the rate of economic growth relative to interest rates as the crucial factor determining the path of the debt-to-GDP ratio over the next few decades. Current projections of GDP growth are relatively low—lower than after WWII.


The Long-Run Fiscal Outlook in the United States
By: Brigid Meisenbacher, Daniel J. Wilson – Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

Can deficits finance themselves?

In this paper, Angeletos et al. analyze how fiscal deficits are financed in environments with two key features: (i) nominal rigidity and (ii) a violation of Ricardian equivalence due to finite lives or liquidity constraints. In such environments, deficits contribute to their own financing via two channels: a boom in real economic activity, which expands the tax base, and a surge in inflation, which erodes the real value of nominal government debt. The authors use a New Keynesian model with overlapping generations of perpetual-youth consumers. When the survival probability is equal to 1, their model reduces to the standard permanent-income representative-agent (PIH) benchmark. When the survival probability is less than 1, then their model has two key properties: (i) consumers discount future disposable income more heavily than in the PIH benchmark, and (ii) they have a larger short-run propensity to consume. These properties are similar to quantitative heterogeneous-agent models and are the main factors that contribute to their results. Finally, fiscal policy is represented by a rule for how tax revenue responds to changes in aggregate income and in public debt, while monetary policy is represented by a rule for how nominal rates adjust based on the state of the economy. They find:

  • Pushing the fiscal adjustment further into the future helps generate a larger and more persistent boom, leading to more self-financing.
  • Full self-financing is possible in the limit as fiscal adjustment is delayed more and more: the government can run a deficit today, refrain from tax hikes or spending cuts in the future, and nevertheless see its debt converge back to its initial level.

Can Deficits Finance Themselves?
Authors: George-Marios Angeletos, Chen Lian, Christian K. Wolf
From: Northwestern University, UC Berkeley, MIT

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

U.S.

Why the Fed Sold Euros, Not Dollars: A Portfolio Balance Reading of the 2026 Yen Intervention

U.S.

Is the U.S. already in recession?

U.S.

On US capitalism

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT