Are preemptive capital controls useful?
In this paper Das et al. undertake a systematic analysis to investigate the effectiveness of preemptive capital flow management (CFM) in the face of risk-off shocks. They argue that as CFMs on inflows before a risk-off shock are often perceived differently by foreign investors than CFMs on outflows during the shock, it is important to treat them as distinct capital account policies. Das et al. use high-frequency monthly data from 56 EMDEs during 1996-2020 and find:
- Countries which had these policies in place any time during the window of five years prior to the risk-off shock, in a preemptive manner, experienced 30% lower interest rate premia when borrowing externally in local currency during the given risk-off shock.
- These preemptive CFMs also lead to lower exchange rate volatility during the risk-off shocks.
- Lower premia during risk-off shocks preserve countries’ access to international markets when they arguably need it most.

Preemptive Policies and Risk-Off Shocks in Emerging Markets
Authors: Mitali Das, Gita Gopinath, Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan
From: International Monetary Fund, University of Maryland
In a newly published Policy Paper, the IMF outlines the new view on the management of capital flows.
- The first proposal allows the preemptive use of capital flows measures/Macroprudential Prudential Measures (CFM/MPM) on foreign currency debt inflows in order to address the systemic risk that could result from foreign exchange mismatches on balance sheets. The proposal would also allow CFM/MPMs in the case of high foreign investor participation in local-currency debt markets;
- The second proposed policy change exempts certain types of capital control measures that are enacted by governments for specific purposes from review.
Review of The Institutional View on The Liberalization and Management of Capital Flows
By: International Monetary Fund