• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Macro

On liquidity traps

Posted by e-axes on January 26, 2021

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Is it possible to identify the type of liquidity trap?

In this paper Cuba-Corda and Singh use a New Keynesian model where the representative agent’s intertemporal Euler equation is modified so that the steady state features a negative relation between output and real interest rate. This modification breaks the tight connection between the natural interest rate and the discount factor, and allows for the possibility of a permanently negative natural interest rate. A key feature of their model is that they allow agents to expect persistent stagnation with ZLB episodes of undefined duration. As a result their framework incorporates two hypotheses of persistent ZLB episodes: expectations-driven liquidity traps and secular stagnation driven liquidity traps.

Can a policy makers understand the type of liquidity trap an economy is experiencing?

They estimate the model using Japanese data from 1998:Q1-2012:Q4, a period in which interest rates remained near zero and find that a policymaker faces considerable real-time uncertainty in identifying the dominant narrative. In view of this uncertainty they outline the need for a robust policy such as appropriate price indexation rules which can increase output under secular stagnation and also eliminate the expectations-driven trap.

Understanding Persistent ZLB: Theory and Assessment
Authors: Pablo Cuba-Borda, Sanjay R. Singh
From: Federal Reserve Board, University of California, Davis

… but do liquidity traps exist?

In this paper Lhuissier et al. compare the effects of monetary policy shocks in situations where the short-term interest rate is near its effective lower bound (ELB) with their effects when this is not the case, using a Bayesian structural vector autoregression (SVAR) framework. They find:

In the case of the euro area, Japan and the United States, a short-term interest rate of zero or below has not, at least up till now, translated into a ”Hicks-type liquidity trap”. Our results reinforce a view of monetary transmission that works predominantly through credit quantities and where the interest rate channel has only a marginal role. In such a view, the central bank’s inability to lower the short-term interest rate is irrelevant, provided that it can ramp up credit supply and if at least some non-financial economic agents are credit-constrained.

Does the liquidity trap exist?
Authors: Stéphane Lhuissier, Benoit Mojon and Juan Rubio-Ramírez
From: BIS

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission
  • Communicating Uncertainty: Fan Charts, Confidence, and Credibility
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?
  • Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT