• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Eurozone

How to stabilize the EU energy market

Posted by e-axes on February 1, 2023

Read Next →

Eurozone

Why Firms Choose the U.S. And What Europe Could Do About It

Eurozone

Europe After the American Umbrella: A New Policy Agenda

Eurozone

From Open Markets to Strategic Scale: Rethinking Europe’s Growth Model

By reducing demand for gas

The war in Ukraine has permanently changed the gas market in Europe with all EU governments desperately trying to find additional sources, mostly in the form of liquefied natural gas, LNG. But this takes time because most LNG is committed under long-term contracts. In this commentary, Daniel Gros suggests a reduction in gas use is necessary. So far, Gros argues EU policy has instead focused on protecting consumers from current high prices. To achieve a reduction in gas consumption he proposes a “gas savings subsidy” i.e. households pay the market price for the gas they consume. But the government provides them with a payment equal to x euros per cubic meter (or kWh) of gas that is saved during the winter of 2022/3 compared to the previous heating period:

[S]carce public resources should be used to reinforce the incentive to save on gas. If governments pay people to use less gas, prices do not need to go much higher to reduce gas consumption. A gas savings subsidy thus offers a way to satisfy voters (at least partially) without sacrificing economic efficiency.

Implications of Gas Scarcity for European Energy Policy
By: Daniel Gros – CEPS

By lowering the price cap

Beginning in 2022, the EU set an electricity wholesale price cap of €3,000/MWh, as well as an automated rule stipulating the ceiling to increase by €1,000/MWh five weeks after each time the realized market price, at any hour in any market area within the EU, was above 60% of the current price limit. The rule was triggered in April and August 2022. But a high and increasing price cap, argue Gerlagh et al. substantially increases the average costs of electricity especially during the current energy crisis. They therefore suggest a reduction in the price cap at least for as long as the current crisis lasts:

The ceiling price is a social contract that defines what can be charged for electricity if there is a shortage. Its level should be such that producers are compensated and thus have an incentive to invest and keep capacity for disruptive situations. The high price is acceptable when it is rarely paid, and only over short periods. The crisis caused by the Russian invasion is different because the disturbance is persistent. The ceiling price must be lowered when the frequency and length of disturbances increases, and can be lowered while keeping the same overall compensation promised to reserve suppliers. We believe a price cap of €1,000/MWh is more reasonable under the current circumstances, and it will substantially reduce the risk premium.
A common concern is that lowering maximum prices may lead to reduced supply, increasing the need for quantity rationing. The data, however, tell us this problem is insignificant. There is virtually no additional supply above €1,000 /MWh.


Stabilizing the EU Electricity Market: Mandatory Demand Reduction and a Lower Price Cap
By: Reyer Gerlagh, Matti Liski, Iivo Vehviläinen – Tilburg University, Aalto University

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Eurozone

Why Firms Choose the U.S. And What Europe Could Do About It

Eurozone

Europe After the American Umbrella: A New Policy Agenda

Eurozone

From Open Markets to Strategic Scale: Rethinking Europe’s Growth Model

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Communicating Uncertainty: Fan Charts, Confidence, and Credibility
  • How Firms’ Cost Expectations Shape Prices
  • Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission
  • Measuring Expectations in Real Time: The Value and Limits of Kalshi Markets
  • Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks
  • When Markets Drift from the Real Economy

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT