• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Macro

Evaluating macro policies

Posted by e-axes on August 24, 2022

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Counterfactual policy analysis

In this paper, McKay and Wolf propose a method that constructs policy counterfactuals using empirical evidence on multiple distinct policy shocks, rather than just a single one.
At the heart of their methodology lies an identification result:

[I]f the econometrician has successfully estimated the effects of contemporaneous shocks to the prevailing rule as well as the effects of news about deviations from the rule at all future horizons, then those estimates contain all the information she needs to construct the counterfactual. Key to the proof is our assumption on how policy rules are allowed to shape private-sector behavior. Since only the expected future path of the policy instrument matters, any given rule—characterized by the instrument path that it implies—can equivalently be synthesized by adding well-chosen shocks to the baseline rule. All that is required is that those policy shocks imply the same expected instrument path from date-0 onwards as the counterfactual rule. Finally we show that, given a loss function, our econometrician can furthermore leverage the same logic to also characterize optimal policy.




What Can Time-Series Regressions Tell Us About Policy Counterfactuals?
Authors: Alisdair McKay, Christian K. Wolf
From: Federal Reserve Board of Minneapolis, MIT

A different way to evaluate a single macro policy

In this paper, Barnichon and Mesters show that it is not necessary to know the full structure of the economy to evaluate a single macro policy decision– in contrast to the above paper that studies systematic changes in the policy rule. They argue that only two statistics are sufficient to detect policies that do not minimize the loss function. The two sufficient statistics are (i) the effects of policy shocks on the policy objectives, and (ii) forecasts for the policy objectives conditional on the policy decision. They introduce the Optimal Policy Perturbation (OPP), the gradient of the loss function, which is entirely determined by the two sufficient statistics, also also has a direct economic interpretation. The OPP is the adjustment to the policy instruments that exactly corrects an optimization failure when the loss function is quadratic and the (unspecified) underlying model is linear.
A Sufficient Statistics Approach for Macro Policy Evaluation
Authors: Régis Barnichon, Geert Mesters
From: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT