• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Climate

Decarbonization amidst a crisis

Posted by e-axes on April 14, 2022

Read Next →

Climate

Is Economic Growth Compatible With Credible Climate Constraints?

Climate

Can Financial Markets and Economic Literacy Reshape the Politics of Climate? Action

Climate

The Cost of Inconsistent and Incredible Climate Policy

Decarbonization in the U.S.

The U.S. needs to treat climate policy as economic policy much like the EU has done, argue Nahm and Urpelainen. The main reason is the U.S. dependence on Chinese imports for low-carbon energy technologies reminiscent of Europe’s dependency on Russian gas:

  • China has increased its share of global solar photovoltaic production from less than 1 percent to over 60 percent of the world’s solar panels;
  • For 15 of the past 17 years, China has added more production capacity for crystalline solar cells than any other country in the world;
  • China dominates most individual steps in the supply chain for the production of electric cars: including the mining and production of nickel, cobalt, and lithium for the manufacturing of cathodes, anodes, and lithium-ion cells;
  • Overall, in 2020, China accounted for 58 percent of global production capacity for wind turbine nacelles.

China’s dominance in the production of low-carbon energy technologies has national security implications in the United States and elsewhere. Without investments in alternative supply chains from raw materials to final assembly, meeting global climate goals could mean trading dependence on Russian fossil fuels for reliance on China for electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy products. As the Ukraine crisis has demonstrated, such interdependencies are easily weaponized.

The US should treat climate policy as economic policy
By: Jonas Nahm, Johannes Urpelainen – Johns Hopkins University

Decarbonization in the EU

In this commentary Robert Stavins of Harvard University interviews Dan Jørgensen, the Danish Minister of Climate, Energy, and Utilities. Some interesting takeaways:

  • The Russia-Ukraine war has made clear the importance of speeding up the green transition away from fossils in Europe. Jørgensen referred to important legislation being negotiated in the European Union which would create new directives on energy efficiency and renewable energy that could, he states, help EU countries greatly reduce their dependency on Russian fossil fuel;
  • About the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), established in 2005 and which now covers more than 11,000 factories, power stations, and other installations in 31 countries, including all 27 EU countries, Jørgensen argued that this system functions as a safeguard of climate policies in periods of crisis when governments focus on dealing with the crisis at the expense of the climate.

Can Europe Decarbonize in the Midst of a Geopolitical Crisis?
By: Robert Stavins – Harvard University

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Climate

Is Economic Growth Compatible With Credible Climate Constraints?

Climate

Can Financial Markets and Economic Literacy Reshape the Politics of Climate? Action

Climate

The Cost of Inconsistent and Incredible Climate Policy

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT