• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Macro

Debt sustainability: a careful look at r-g

Posted by e-axes on January 7, 2021

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

When r-g exhibits variability

In this paper, Mehrotra and Sergeyev, argue that the combination of low growth and low real interest rates carry contradictory implications for debt sustainability. In particular, they find that data for advanced economies show that  r − g exhibits substantial variability over the medium-term. For the US and most other advanced economies, the cost of servicing public debt r − g is negative but a sudden rise in interest rates relative to growth with a large stock of debt could quickly result in explosive debt dynamics. The authors provide a theoretical framework for assessing debt sustainability in an environment when, on average, r < g. They use a continuous-time general equilibrium endowment economy where debt-to-GDP ratio is stochastic. They show that:

  • When debt servicing costs are negative, the debt-to-GDP ratio may be non-explosive in the sense of having a well-defined stationary distribution, but that may not satisfy the sustainability criteria;
  • Slower trend growth improves debt sustainability, while higher output risk reduces the interest rates for most of the equilibrium levels of debt but also tightens the fiscal limit.


Debt Sustainability in a Low Interest Rate World
Authors: Neil R. Mehrotra, Dmitriy Sergeyev
From: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Bocconi University

When r-g is not the whole story

In this paper, Ricardo Reis introduces the marginal product of capital (m) into the equation of r – g. In particular, he argues that m, according to US data, has stayed relatively constant, and is well above the growth rate of output, so g < m, an indication that the economy is dynamically efficient. But r < g < m implies that  there is still a meaningful government budget constraint once future surpluses and debt are discounted by the marginal product of capital. He develops a model of infinitely-lived households who invest in linear technologies and incomplete financial market since entrepreneurs cannot borrow as much as they would like to invest in their technology. Government bonds in this model, provide both safety against production risk and liquidity. Some of his results include:

  • One-time deficit gambles are feasible;
  • The government can increase public spending and pay for it by collecting a bubble premium on the debt, but this lowers the interest rate, increases inequality, and has an upper bound that is lower in more financially
    developed economies;
  • Inflation volatility reduces the fiscal space available for spending.

The constraint on public debt when r < g but g < m
Author: Ricardo Reis
From: LSE

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT