How storms and heat waves affect migration within the U.S.
In this paper, Bilal and Rossi-Hansberg analyze how agents, who anticipate the effect of climate change on productivity and capital depreciation, make forward-looking migration and local capital investment decisions. The authors develop a general equilibrium dynamic quantitative spatial model of the 3,143 counties in the U.S. economy. Some of their conclusions:
- Anticipation of adverse weather has small average effects on welfare but leads to large increases in migration flows, and large changes in the geography of investment, as workers and capitalists correctly anticipate the persistence of climate damages in particular regions.
- Accounting for the effect of temperature on capital depreciation, through the impact of more frequent storms, is essential to obtain more accurate estimates of the welfare losses of climate change. In particular, the impact of climate on capital depreciation magnifies the U.S. aggregate welfare costs of climate change twofold to nearly 5% in 2023 under a business-as-usual warming scenario.
- In the U.S., migration also has a very small average impact on welfare, but it leads to substantial increases in the dispersion of worker and capitalist welfare across locations; worker movements increase the losses in the value of capital at locations harmed by climate change.


Anticipating Climate Change Across the United States
Authors: Adrien Bilal, Esteban Rossi-Hansberg
From: Harvard University, University of Chicago
Migration with “climate matching
In this paper, Obolensky et al. introduce the concept of “climate matching” as a driver of migration. Their key findings are:
- Using historical US census data, the authors show that climate strongly predicts the spatial distribution of international migrants in the US, both historically (1850-1940) and recently (2011-2019). Migrants tend to select destinations with climates similar to their origin. In addition, the authors find that locations whose climate converged over time experienced increased migration between them. The results are robust to controlling for geographic distance, networks, and other confounders.
- Two factors can explain these findings: a) climate-specific human capital (e.g. farming expertise and techniques for surviving extreme heat or cold events) and b) climate as an amenity (e.g. migrants might value a familiar climate to the extent that it facilitates the persistence of cultural practices). Results are larger for farmers, supporting the human capital mechanism, but effects also exist for non-farmers, suggesting climate as an amenity matters too.
- Projections indicate climate change may reshape US internal migration flows, as locations become more connected due to converging climates.
Homeward Bound: How Migrants Seek Out Familiar Climates
Authors: Marguerite Obolensky, Marco Tabellini, Charles A Taylor
From: Columbia University, Harvard Business School, Harvard Kennedy School