• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Macro

Biases in empirical research

Posted by e-axes on February 16, 2021

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Bias in evaluating QE

Fabo et al., in this paper, analyze 54 studies looking at the effect of QE on growth and inflation and authored by economists in academia and central banks. They find that on average these studies show that QE has a positive effect on inflation and growth. But they also find that papers written entirely by central bankers found an impact on growth at the peak of QE that was more than 0.7 percentage points higher than the effect estimated in papers written entirely by academics. For inflation, the difference in the effect of QE at its peak between the two sets of papers was more than 1.2 percentage points. They argue that these differences among the two sets of estimates can be attributed to career concerns of central bank researchers. In particular, they find that central bankers who found the largest impact of QE had a better chance of receiving a promotion. The one exception is researchers working at the Bundesbank who found smaller effects on output than academics, in line with the bank’s position.



Fifty Shades of QE: Conflicts of Interest in Economic Research
Authors: Brian Fabo, Martina Jančoková, Elisabeth Kempf, Luboš Pástor
From: National Bank of Slovakia, European Central Bank, University of Chicago, CEPR

Bias in evaluating fiscal multipliers

Can an author’s national background and economic policy orientation, the financial sources funding the research, and career-related publication incentives help explain the size of fiscal multiplier estimates? This is the question that Asatryan et al. are trying to answer. They look at 104 multiplier studies and test for author, funding, and publication biases. They find:

  • Researchers from countries with a large government and high level of regulation present larger fiscal multiplier estimates than researchers from countries with a small government and low regulation;
  • Government-funded research provides larger fiscal multiplier estimates than non-government-funded research.


Biases in fiscal multiplier estimates
Authors: Zareh Asatryan, Annika Havlik, Friedrich Heinemann, Justus Nove
From: ZEW Mannheim, CESifo, University of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Macro

AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth

Macro

AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?

Macro

Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission
  • Communicating Uncertainty: Fan Charts, Confidence, and Credibility
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?
  • Asia’s Expanding Non-Dollar Payment Networks

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT