• Twitter
  • Search
e-axes

360° Econ View

The issues, the debates, and the research

  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Useful Data
  • About
  • Contact

Monetary Policy

Asymmetric Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area

Posted by e-axes on May 6, 2026

Read Next →

Monetary Policy

Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission

Monetary Policy

Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening

Monetary Policy

When Debt Erodes Central Bank Independence

Rate hikes vs. rate cuts: asymmetries in Euro Area monetary policy transmission

In this paper, Michael Pfarrhofer and Anna Stelzer examine whether a rate hike and a rate cut of the same magnitude produce mirror-image effects on credit, output, and inflation, or whether one is systematically more powerful than the other. The authors develop a nonlinear mixed-frequency model that combines monthly and quarterly euro area data in a single framework, avoiding information loss from aggregation. To capture nonlinearities without imposing a specific functional form, they use Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), letting the data determine the shape of relationships.

The model incorporates both standard macro/financial variables from January 2003 to September 2023 and four Bank Lending Survey (BLS) factors measuring credit channel dynamics (broad credit conditions, bank lending, borrower balance sheets, and credit demand).

Findings

  • Tightening dominates easing: Contractionary monetary policy produces strong, statistically significant, and persistent responses in credit, output, and inflation. Expansionary policy yields muted or insignificant effects.
  • Bank channels are asymmetric: The credit, bank lending, and borrower balance sheet channels all show pronounced sign asymmetries. Tightening sharply tightens credit standards; easing does not comparably loosen them. The one partial exception is credit demand, which responds positively to easing, though still less than it falls under tightening.
  • Nonlinear shapes matter: Parametric approximations (linear, sign-nonlinearity, size-nonlinearity) fit poorly compared to the flexible BART estimates, confirming that richer nonlinear structures are needed.
  • Limited state-dependence: The asymmetries hold up whether the economy is in recession or expansion, and whether interest rates are near the effective lower bound or not, suggesting the asymmetry is structural, rooted in how banks and borrowers respond, rather than cyclical.
  • Inflation behaves differently: Larger contractionary shocks have disproportionately smaller effects on inflation , while large expansionary shocks have disproportionately larger effects, a subtle but policy-relevant nonlinearity.

Are there asymmetries in euro area monetary policy?
Authors: Michael Pfarrhofer, Anna Stelzer
From: Vienna University of Economics and Business, Oesterreichische Nationalbank

The micro roots of asymmetric monetary policy transmission in the euro area

Pfarrhofer and Stelzer, above, show that the credit channel and bank lending channel react strongly to tightening but weakly to easing. In this paper, Donata Faccia, Franziska Hünnekes, and Petra Köhler-Ulbrich supply a bank-level rationale: the structural asymmetry arises because impaired banks are forced to tighten standards during rate hikes but face far less pressure to loosen them when rates fall.
The authors build a unique quarterly bank-firm panel dataset spanning 10 euro area countries from 2008 to 2020. The dataset links three sources: confidential Individual Bank Lending Survey (IBLS) data (the bank-level replies underlying the aggregate BLS), bank financial data from SNL (CET1 capital ratios, CDS spreads, loan loss provisions), and firm balance sheet data from Orbis Europe (leverage, Altman Z-score, ROA) — matching roughly 101 banks to 1.8 million firms.

Findings

  • Bank health drives credit standards: Banks with lower CET1 capital ratios set tighter credit standards i.e. a one standard deviation increase in the CET1 ratio leads to approximately 0.2 standard deviations easier credit standards.
  • Firm risk interacts with bank health: Banks tighten standards more when linked to higher-risk firms (higher leverage or lower Altman Z-score), but this effect is substantially dampened when the bank itself is well-capitalised.
  • Funding costs amplify tightening for weak banks: When bank funding costs rise, less well-capitalised banks tighten their credit standards significantly more  especially when their borrowers are already risky. Healthy banks barely adjust.
  • Heterogeneity in the bank lending channel: Overall, the paper provides systematic micro-level evidence that the strength of the bank lending channel depends critically on the joint financial health of both the lender and the borrower.

What drives banks’ credit standards? An analysis based on a large bank-firm panel
Authors: Donata Faccia, Franziska Hünnekes, Petra Köhler-Ulbrich
From: ECB

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

e-axes

Read Next →

Monetary Policy

Macroeconomic Risk: From Scenario Synthesis to Distributional Transmission

Monetary Policy

Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening

Monetary Policy

When Debt Erodes Central Bank Independence

Comments are Closed

Account

  • Login

Subscriptions

You are not logged in.
Login
Subscribe

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Most Read

  • Gold, the Dollar, and the Geopolitics of Global Reserves
  • China and the Political Economy of Critical Minerals
  • Public Debt Maturity and Macroeconomic Policy Transmission
  • Bank Heterogeneity and the Transmission of Monetary Tightening
  • AI, Knowledge and the Future of Human Expertise
  • AI Valuations, Capital Investment, and Growth
  • New and Noteworthy Books in Economics (September)
  • AI and the Natural Rate: Puzzle or Policy Challenge?
  • Transfers, Taxes, and the Ricardian Equivalence
  • Can Institutions Limit the Economic Damage of Populism?

Sections

  • AI
  • Banking
  • Books
  • Brexit
  • CBDC
  • China
  • Climate
  • COVID-19
  • Crypto
  • Demographics
  • Economic Growth
  • Economic Science
  • Economics of Information
  • Emerging Markets
  • Eurozone
  • Financial Markets
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • India
  • Inequality
  • Inflation
  • International Economics
  • Macro
  • Markets
  • Monetary Policy
  • Oil
  • Politics & Economics
  • Taxation
  • Tech
  • Trade
  • U.S.
  • Ukraine-Russia War
  • Uncategorized
  • Useful Data

© 2026 e-axes

  • Privacy Policy & Terms of Service

Theme by Anders Norén

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Cookie settingsAccept
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT